Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id VAA04587 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 6 Aug 2001 21:00:11 +0100 Subject: Re: Logic Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 15:56:44 -0400 x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> To: "memetics list" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20010806195727.AAA27152@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
On 08/06/01 15:10, Dace said this-
>Morphic resonance need not be intentional. It follows naturally from the
>priniple of like-affects-like. What Sheldrake is proposing is a law of
>natural forms.
Ah ha....
Sheldrake is the Hahnemann of mentality- thus we now have a homeopathic
(and equally useless) theory of memory, a 'law of similars' -
'like-affects-like'....
Jeez.
The newage is always old, and will always and repeatedly rhyme with
sewage.
How many times does this 'resonance' need to be diluted, and shaken, not
stirred?
- Wade
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 06 2001 - 21:04:25 BST