RE: Logic (to Joe)

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Sat Jul 28 2001 - 23:33:28 BST

  • Next message: Pascal Jouxtel: "Re: Logic + universal evolution"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id XAA17322 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 28 Jul 2001 23:29:47 +0100
    From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 17:33:28 -0500
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: RE: Logic (to Joe)
    Message-ID: <3B62F768.11531.19E448@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <996317568.3b629980a566a@rugth1.phys.rug.nl>
    References: <3B6237D1.13534.213BB84@localhost>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On 28 Jul 2001, at 12:52, Philip Jonkers wrote:

    > Philip:
    > >>I'm sorry if this is source of confusion. I hope I can settle
    > >> this once and for all. With `fittest' I do not
    > >> mean to denote a species being superior in an absolute sense.
    > >> More so in a relative sense instead. That is, I refer to
    > >> the best adapted species compared to other species occupying
    > >> the same positions in the food chain (better yet `food web'):
    > >> peer-species, if you like. These are the species that compete one
    > >> and other for the resources they are designed for to exploit by
    > >> evolution (not creation!). Species taking no part in this relative
    > >> struggle are bound to be engaged in other struggles. Each of these
    > >> struggles, local competitions, has a winner : this is what I meant
    > >> with the `fittest'.
    >
    > Joe:
    > > There are two possible meanings here:
    > > 1) those that are able to horn in on the most expansive niche, and
    > > 2) those who are able to most securely glue themselves to a disputed
    > > niche.
    > >
    > > Which is under dispute?
    >
    > I can't tell, please elaborate on the distinction between these
    > niches. I'll reply afer the weekend though...
    >
    > Philip.
    >
    I thought of a third, where we clearly have no peer:
    Those that are able to change the widest array of niches to the
    greatest degree to suit them.
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 28 2001 - 23:33:56 BST