Re: Logic

From: TJ Olney (market@cc.wwu.edu)
Date: Tue Jul 24 2001 - 19:52:17 BST

  • Next message: Pascal Jouxtel: "Re: Memes and Archetypes"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA09955 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 24 Jul 2001 19:52:31 +0100
    Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 11:52:17 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
    From: TJ Olney <market@cc.wwu.edu>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: Re: Logic
    In-Reply-To: <005901c11467$ef5e3480$5f25f4d8@teddace>
    Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.33.0107241151260.177-100000@C157775-A.frndl1.wa.home.com>
    X-X-Sender: market@[140.160.80.17]
    Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Well, I appreciate everyone's thoughts on logic!

    Perhaps one difficulty is that there are many kinds of logic. The following
    represents one that Bateson labeled (for reasons I'd enjoy knowing), logic in
    Barbara.

    Men die.
    Grass dies.
    Men are grass.

    It is just as "logical" as the more common syllogistic form, but represents
    a different "kind" of logic.

    All men die.
    Socrates is a man.
    Socrates must die.

    TJ

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 24 2001 - 19:56:34 BST