Re: Memetic vulnerability: was: Faking It

From: Kenneth Van Oost (Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be)
Date: Thu Jul 19 2001 - 21:39:10 BST

  • Next message: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re: Memetic vulnerability: was: Faking It"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id VAA01023 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 19 Jul 2001 21:00:27 +0100
    Message-ID: <000901c11092$f4740b80$35a1bed4@default>
    From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745FB2@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    Subject: Re: Memetic vulnerability: was: Faking It
    Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 22:39:10 +0200
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
    X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Hi Vincent,
    You wrote,
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>

    > I'm not sure I agree with this Kenneth,
    > If we look at nature, surely we see patterns of species in lots of
    different
    > environments developing the same responses, to highly consistent
    > environmental features, e.g. lots of species have eyes (of varying kinds).
    > [is that what they call convergent evolution?] Surely memes must work
    > within the limited (perhaps not as limited as the physical world for
    natural
    > selection) environment of human society?

    << In my view memes still work within the limited environment of human
    society !
    But I think I construes the notion of limitation a little bit more broadly
    as you do. In a sense, I expand that limitation beyond the sensorial
    bounderies. I expand the concept of memes as far as the concept of
    abstraction, whereby the consequence of any possible meme gets
    directly included in the way I present the subject.
    I include directly a " practical " way of application if you like.
    And by the same token of abstraction " anything " can " act " as a meme
    in such a form of concept.

    Not sure this makes sense,

    Best regards,

    Kenneth

    ( I am, because we are)

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 19 2001 - 21:06:33 BST