Re: Memetic vulnerability: was: Faking It

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Thu Jul 19 2001 - 11:54:55 BST

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: Memetic vulnerability: was: Faking It" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id LAA00255 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 19 Jul 2001 11:58:04 +0100
Subject: Re: Memetic vulnerability: was: Faking It
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 06:54:55 -0400
x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu
x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-ID: <20010719105456.AAA12881@camailp.harvard.edu@[205.240.180.53]>
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    Hi Kenneth Van Oost -

    >Once a meme is set

    Ah, but that's momentary and environmental, this 'set' of which evolution
    must speak. Change one thing, even time, and the setting is gone.

    >each time that counts for a new meme.

    Time marches on.

    That ain't your grandfather's meme.

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 19 2001 - 12:02:08 BST