Re: sexual selection and memes

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Tue Jul 03 2001 - 22:11:34 BST

  • Next message: Chris Taylor: "Re: sexual selection and memes"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id WAA02512 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 3 Jul 2001 22:08:28 +0100
    From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 16:11:34 -0500
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
    Content-transfer-encoding: Quoted-printable
    Subject: Re: sexual selection and memes
    Message-ID: <3B41EEB6.1738.1F589C@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <3B41E34B.2474F002@bioinf.man.ac.uk>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On 3 Jul 2001, at 16:22, Chris Taylor wrote:

    > joedees@bellsouth.net wrote:
    > >
    > > On 2 Jul 2001, at 10:18, Chris Taylor wrote:
    > >
    > > > I think because memes are not bound by having to produce two sexes
    > > > in the way that genes are, it is much simpler for them to
    > > > specialise to only be 'fit' in a male (or to only be noticeably
    > > > expressed in a male, which I think is your point Vincent).
    > > >
    > > Genes can do that - or have we all forgotten male pattern baldness?
    >
    > Well yeah, and genitals, but the point is that all these genes have to
    > survive being in a female as well as a male at some point - there has
    > to be a (switching) mechanism to take account of their presence. What
    > I'm on about is the possibility of direct inheritance (vertical or
    > horizontal) from male to male (or female to female) without any
    > account being taken of the existence (if you like) of the opposite
    > gender. For example (in humans) there are many views, held by one
    > gender (or at least parts of it), of the opposite sex, which simply
    > could not survive in the context of the other sex's mind - all women
    > are X, all men are Y etc.
    >
    It goes without saying that all genes tranmitted to only one of the
    two sexes would have to be found on their differential genes - the
    male Y or the female second X. Do we have any examples of
    same, where one sex does not latently carry genes that are only
    expressed in the other?
    > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    > Chris Taylor (chris@bioinf.man.ac.uk)
    > http://bioinf.man.ac.uk/ »people»chris
    > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    ===============================This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 03 2001 - 22:12:26 BST