Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA15028 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 24 Jun 2001 20:47:53 +0100 Subject: Re: The Guardian on Information Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 15:44:13 -0400 x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20010624194415.AAA3496@camailp.harvard.edu@[205.240.180.176]> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Hi Robin Faichney -
>(I.e. a
>practically universal consensus is reached that treating physical
>structure as information is more useful than not.)
Yeah, I totally am with you on the not-understanding front, but, hmmm,
treating things as being more useful than not is only a handy tool
towards understanding, not a property of what is being studied,
necessarily.
Certainly the structure's structure is informative....
But I'm totally with Joe when he says one needs an entity that is being
informed, and, I can't see any other entity being informed than, well,
homo sapiens sapiens.
And it's sometimes dangerous sharing jargons, or to settle with what is
convenient.
- Wade
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 24 2001 - 20:51:48 BST