Re: USA Today - interview with Gugatkin and de Waal on animal culture

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Fri Jun 08 2001 - 18:49:15 BST

  • Next message: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re: Research in memetics"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA15553 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 8 Jun 2001 18:46:44 +0100
    From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 12:49:15 -0500
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: USA Today - interview with Gugatkin and de Waal on animal culture
    Message-ID: <3B20C9CB.4972.1667C2@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <F129M1JOMyQlmLFQG1000011f2e@hotmail.com>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On 8 Jun 2001, at 9:12, Scott Chase wrote:

    >
    >
    >
    >
    > >From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
    > >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > >To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    > >Subject: Re: USA Today - interview with Gugatkin and de Waal on
    > >animal culture Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 21:18:29 -0400
    > >
    > >Hi Ray Recchia -
    > >
    > > >His and de Waal's accounts may just be persuasive enough to
    > > >convince humans it's finally time to open the door and allow
    > > >animals into the culture club.
    > >
    > >Or, perhaps, to remove "culture" from the behavior club....
    > >
    > >
    > Why? What would be wrong with using the word "culture" if defined in
    > terms of "nongenetic behavioral transmission" (see de Waal. 2001. The
    > Ape and the Sushi Master. Basic Books. New York, p. 237). The big
    > problem would not be in using the word "culture", but employing this
    > term in a way that anthropocentrically places humans within a charmed
    > circle, removed from the "lowly" animals.
    >
    > One problem I could see would be the casting of cultural capacity in
    > terms of homology versus analogy. If other apes such as our chimp
    > cousins can exhibit traces of culture it would't be much of a leap to
    > consider something homologous underlying this, but if we attribute
    > fish, insects or other groups phylogenetically far removed from us
    > with culture, then we might consider if we are talking about the same
    > phenomenon or something superficially similar that has arisen via
    > convergence.
    >
    > If a sort of non-genic transmission of behavior that could have been
    > called culture existed in the common ancestor we shared with these
    > other groups, then homology might enter the picture. Did the stem
    > group of the metazoans have culture? It might be less contentious to
    > think about the stem of the human and non-human apes exhibiting
    > something cultural. Crude tool usage by chimps makes one wonder how
    > unique the "third chimp" (sensu Diamond) really is.
    >
    > With no background in anthropology or primatology, I'm just babbling
    > forth, chewing my cud so to speak.
    >
    Specifically, chimps do not use tools, but manually modify
    implements for present tasks; manually stripping branches to feed
    on termites falls within this category. Technically (that is,
    anthropologically) speaking, a tool is an object used to modify
    another object (such as the rock used to knap a handaxe); no
    nonhuman primates are known to use tools in the wild. Neither do
    they retain implements (it was opined that they left implements at
    a use site and returned to use them again, but this is wishful
    hermeneutics; the Occam explanation is that they discard them
    onsite when they are finished with them and use what is available
    when they return), nor do they assemble toolkits composed of
    differing and task-specific shapes. While paying attention to the
    similarities between Homo and simians, it is important not to
    overlook the differences. Reference: INVERSTIGATIONS INTO
    THE ORIGIN OF LANGUAGE AND CONSCIOUSNESS, by Tran
    Duc Thao, D. Reidel 1984.
    > _________________________________________________________________ Get
    > your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 08 2001 - 18:50:34 BST