Re: le corruption

From: Kenneth Van Oost (Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be)
Date: Sun Jun 03 2001 - 16:08:18 BST

  • Next message: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re: le corruption"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id WAA06637 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 3 Jun 2001 22:12:59 +0100
    Message-ID: <000f01c0ec3f$063f9960$aaa0bed4@default>
    From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <20010601131055.AAA22747%camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]> <002f01c0eb4f$23a47ca0$0ca0bed4@default>
    Subject: Re: le corruption
    Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 17:08:18 +0200
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
    X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: Wade T.Smith <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
    > To: memetics list <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    > Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 3:10 PM
    > Subject: Re: le corruption
    >
    >
    > > On 06/01/01 09:01, Chris Taylor said this-
    > >
    > > >> What I meant was, people who _do_ obey moral and ethical precepts are
    > > >> often at a disadvantage in the power structure.
    >
    > > >Sorry - I think I had you back to front (so to speak).
    >
    > > And I ain't just talking about laws....
    >
    > << Couldn 't agree more on this !
    > Try for example to ride from London to Manchester obeying all the rules
    > of the traffic code. You would be surprised, I suppose, that you were the
    > only one to do so !!
    > Not only you would have spend more time on the road, what in a sense
    > is in one way safier and in the other way it is not ( you fall asleep),
    your
    > petrol consumption would be less ( although that would stay in the balance
    > if you don 't " jump " red lights ( start- stop etc)) and third and IMO
    > the
    > most important factor, driving at the maximum speed if everybody else
    > is exencive over that limit well that would be dangerous, not for you per-
    > sonaly but also for the others uses of the road. They don 't execpt to
    find
    > a car driving at the maximum speed...
    > ( and one of the reasons why traffic- agression occurs (everybody is so
    > winded up behind the wheel that one single driver holding the maximum
    > speed is enough to enlight the whole thing.))
    >
    > Cases like that are now under investigation in order to adapt the speed
    > onto the " real" situation. One reason why files do occur is due to the
    > fact
    > that not all of the cars drive at the same speed.
    > In Belgium there exist in the summer months, when everybody is trying
    > to get to the seaside, a system called ' block- driving '.
    > All the cars have to stay behind one motorcycle of the police who drives
    > them at the speed of 80 km/ h to the sea.
    > No files, lesser accidents, more sunshine,....
    >
    > Best,
    >
    > Kenneth
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 03 2001 - 22:16:47 BST