RE: Information

From: Scott Chase (ecphoric@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon May 14 2001 - 05:01:03 BST

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: memetics of the heroine"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id FAA14514 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 14 May 2001 05:05:04 +0100
    X-Originating-IP: [209.240.220.199]
    From: "Scott Chase" <ecphoric@hotmail.com>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: RE: Information
    Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 00:01:03 -0400
    Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
    Message-ID: <F18MCIqtQvAauNjVuMh00005be3@hotmail.com>
    X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 May 2001 04:01:03.0944 (UTC) FILETIME=[7EBD3480:01C0DC2A]
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    >From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >Subject: RE: Information
    >Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 15:29:33 -0500
    >
    >On 13 May 2001, at 11:48, Scott Chase wrote:
    >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > >From: "Richard Brodie" <richard@brodietech.com>
    > > >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > > >To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    > > >Subject: RE: Information
    > > >Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 00:02:53 -0700
    > > >
    > > >Wade wrote:
    > > >
    > > ><<Look, I totally agree that _anything_ that _anyone_ has _ever_ said
    > > >at _any_ time is _fiction_- and thus opinion is a great deal of it,
    > > >and that the best thing that anyone could ever say would also be open
    > > >to opinion, but the _best way to use a word_ ain't, and never was, a
    > > >matter of _opinion_. It has always and shall ever more remain, a
    > > >matter of consensus.>>
    > > >
    > > >What's the consensus on the use of the word "ain't"?
    > > >
    > > It's a highly regarded word here in the South. Y'all is also a staple
    > > word as in "Hey y'all, we ain't got no more beer." Consensus has it
    > > that these words are here to stay. Ivy leaguers might have a different
    > > take on whether these words belong in a person's vocabulary (or
    > > idiolect?), but they ain't gonna purge us of the sacred slang.
    > >
    >It would thouroughly discombobulate southerners to even so much
    >as contemplate losing their special jargon; they'd have conniption
    >fits if such attempts were made.
    >
    >
    Not as bad a conniption fit the apoplectic paleoanthropologists forced to
    review a dog chewed Malibu Barbie doll head would suffer. Those sorts of
    "specimens" are a dime a dozen around clothes lines here in the heart of the
    South. My guess would be that the bite marks match well with those of your
    typical pit bull terrier.

    [add Hee Haw theme here]

    _________________________________________________________________
    Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 14 2001 - 05:08:43 BST