Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id XAA12253 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 12 May 2001 23:26:25 +0100 Subject: Re: Information Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 18:22:23 -0400 x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20010512222223.AAA10814@camailp.harvard.edu@[205.240.180.8]> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Hi Scott Chase -
>Is consensus anything more than collective opinion?
Good point, in this realm of semantics.
Yes, a consensus is the opinioned position of a collective.
The best use of a word is a matter of its success at being understood by
a collective.
Opinions about words (and words that give rise to numerous opinions) do
not lead to the making of statements of high comprehension.
Humpty-Dumpty-ism is, granted, an extreme opinionated position. But the
best use of a word, or of anything, is not simply a matter of opinion,
and never has been, except in a communicative gathering of one, which is,
of course, impossible.
- Wade
`When _I_ use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, `it
means just what I choose it to mean -- neither more nor less.'
`The question is,' said Alice, `whether you CAN make words mean so many
different things.'
`The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, `which is to be master - - that's
all.'
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat May 12 2001 - 23:30:04 BST