Re: Information

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Sat May 12 2001 - 19:27:01 BST

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: Information"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA11939 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 12 May 2001 19:24:50 +0100
    From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 13:27:01 -0500
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: Information
    Message-ID: <3AFD3A25.32642.A87C8@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <20010511200133.B709@ii01.org>
    References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745E7B@inchna.stir.ac.uk>; from v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk on Thu, May 10, 2001 at 10:26:56AM +0100
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On 11 May 2001, at 20:01, Robin Faichney wrote:

    > On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 10:26:56AM +0100, Vincent Campbell wrote: >
    > Sorry to butt in, but this line does draw one's attention- > > >
    > >>The best way to use any word is entirely a matter of opinion. > > >
    > I agree with Wade, although I suspect it's a matter of clarifying >
    > your meaning. IF you mean that there are no absolutely correct, or
    > neutral, > ways in which to use words, then that's fine.
    >
    > Drop "absolutely" and "or neutral" and that's what I mean. The only
    > "correct" usage is that which achieves what the user wants.
    >
    > (The bit about neutrality is probably right too, but it's not what I'm
    > saying here.)
    >
    The correct way to use a word is that way that successfully
    communicates your intent to your interlocuter (successful dialogue
    is powered by mutual convention regarding word definition); this
    requires that the two of you agree, to a high degree, upon the
    meaning of the word
    > --
    > Robin Faichney
    > Get your Meta-Information from http://www.ii01.org
    > (CAUTION: contains philosophy, may cause heads to spin)
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat May 12 2001 - 19:28:27 BST