Re: Information

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Mon May 07 2001 - 15:36:56 BST

  • Next message: Scott Chase: "Re: memetics-digest V1 #667" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id PAA00241 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 7 May 2001 15:41:28 +0100
Subject: Re: Information
Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 10:36:56 -0400
x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu
x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
To: "memetics list" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-ID: <20010507143713.AAA6438@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    On 05/07/01 09:42, Mark Mills said this-

    >>Substituting terms then, neural memetics is evolutionary psychology.

    >I suspect there is a difference between evolutionary psychology and
    >neural-memetics regarding the role of intention. Evolutionary psychology
    >allows for the use of 'intentional' psychological states.

    So, the equation does not balance unless it states- 'neural memetics is
    intentionless evolutionary psychology'?

    Yes?

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 07 2001 - 15:45:34 BST