Re: Information

From: Mark Mills (mmills@htcomp.net)
Date: Mon May 07 2001 - 02:14:52 BST

  • Next message: wilkins: "Re: Information"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id DAA29047 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 7 May 2001 03:11:23 +0100
    Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.0.20010506200502.020e0ec0@pop3.htcomp.net>
    X-Sender: mmills@pop3.htcomp.net
    X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
    Date: Sun, 06 May 2001 20:14:52 -0500
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    From: Mark Mills <mmills@htcomp.net>
    Subject: Re: Information
    In-Reply-To: <3AF5ECA7.4F801F8A@wehi.edu.au>
    References: <3AED8233.15786.6E25AE@localhost> <20010501175304.A1297@ii01.org> <3AEEB6DE.18806.39FF8D@localhost> <20010502094920.A752@ii01.org> <3AF0B02C.605EB5F@wehi.edu.au> <20010504101910.A533@ii01.org>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    John Wilkins wrote,

    At 10:30 AM 5/7/01 +1000, you wrote:
    >There is a philosophical conundrum known as the "linguistic prison" - in
    >order to discuss things we must cast them in liguistic terms, but we are
    >discussing in the areas of truth and mind matters that cannot be so cast
    >without prejudicing the argument - in short, whereof one cannot speak,
    >thereof one must be silent (and as some wag had it, "and you can't
    >whistle it either"). How meaning is encoded is very much context
    >relative - see Dretske's book. The encoding protocol used determines the
    >meaning of a message at receiver.

    This seems to presuppose the externalist premiss that there is nothing but
    a blank slate from the skin in.

    If all people have a similar set of conceptual dispositions, dispostions to
    create stories for instance, then one can lead a 'listener' through an
    exercise in perceptional chains with somewhat predictable results. The
    message may not be one that can be 'spoken,' but a predictable mental state
    may be replicated (communicated) to the listener.

    In Wittgensteinian terms, 'of what one cannot speak, one must be
    indirect.' Wittgenstein was a confirmed externalist, so he would naturally
    disagree. Example of this are mass marketers in great multitudes. Eastern
    spirtual advisors do the same thing, too.

    BTW, I thought you hated the 'encoding' notion...

    Mark

    http://www.htcomp.net/markmills

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 07 2001 - 03:14:57 BST