Re: Information

From: William Benzon (bbenzon@mindspring.com)
Date: Thu May 03 2001 - 13:41:53 BST

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Fwd: A rich rivalry for wordniks"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA21881 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 3 May 2001 13:45:49 +0100
    User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.0 (1513)
    Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 08:41:53 -0400
    Subject: Re: Information
    From: William Benzon <bbenzon@mindspring.com>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Message-ID: <B716CA50.9044%bbenzon@mindspring.com>
    In-Reply-To: <3AF0CE64.48384526@wehi.edu.au>
    Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    on 5/2/01 11:20 PM, wilkins at wilkins@wehi.EDU.AU wrote:

    >>>>
    >>> Actually, #4 is VERY important, for it is significance, or meaning,
    >>> that comprises a meme; that is what is propagated. Behaviors and
    >>> discourse, the engines of imitation, MEAN something to those doing or
    >>> saying them. A meme is the selfsame meme regardless of whether it is
    >>> performed, spoken or written; it is not the code or carrier which
    >>> matter (although one kind or another must obtain, which is of no
    >>> consequence), but the content; that is, memetic identity is a matter
    >>> of semantics and pragmatics, not syntactics.
    >
    > This is what I call the Intentional Fallacy (in reverse homage to
    > Dennett).

    FWIW, this term has an established use among aestheticians and literary
    critics. I believe it was coined by Monroe Beardsley, but am not sure. In
    this context the Intentional Fallacy is the notion that an author's (or
    artist's) stated intention about a literary work is to be taken at face
    value as a statement of what the work means or is about.

    The idea was adopted by the so-called New Critics (after WWII) and was
    intended to counter biographical approaches to literary criticism. The New
    Critics believed that the text itself contained all you needed to formulate
    a valid interpretation.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 03 2001 - 13:49:22 BST