Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA19970 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 2 May 2001 19:39:01 +0100 Subject: Re: Information Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 14:34:33 -0400 x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> To: "memetics list" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20010502183444.AAA19358@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
On 05/02/01 12:54, Robin Faichney said this-
>You really need to read
>http://www.newscientist.com/ns/19990130/iisthelaw.html
>before you say any more about this.
Happy to comply-
>"Frieden's shown that a host of what used to be
> regarded as fundamental equations of physics are
> actually capable of derivation," says Hawkes.
And I'm happy to agree with this- especially since he used 'derivation'
and not 'generate'....
I remit - "If someone does generate laws of physics, they are making them
up."
I think Frieden is saying the same thing.
- Wade
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 02 2001 - 19:42:39 BST