Re: Information

From: Robin Faichney (robin@ii01.org)
Date: Wed May 02 2001 - 13:52:05 BST

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: Information"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA19111 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 2 May 2001 13:59:24 +0100
    Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 13:52:05 +0100
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Information
    Message-ID: <20010502135205.C582@ii01.org>
    References: <003601c0cdfc$a106bd40$f5e3adcb@oemcomputer> <Pine.WNT.4.21.0104281650090.274-100000@C157775-A.frndl1.wa.home.com>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: inline
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
    In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.21.0104281650090.274-100000@C157775-A.frndl1.wa.home.com>; from market@cc.wwu.edu on Tue, May 01, 2001 at 06:27:19PM -0700
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@ii01.org>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 06:27:19PM -0700, TJ Olney wrote:
    >
    > Information is a system phenomenon dealing with difference.

    Information is whatever we use the word to refer to. To be dogmatic
    about definitions is futile.

    > Shannon-Weaver
    > type "information" is sometimes information, sometimes not.

    You mean that usage sometimes conforms to your prefered usage, sometimes
    not.

    > It is
    > unfortunately another "logical type" problem to consider states as
    > information without reference to something for which the state makes a
    > difference.

    I don't know what you mean by "'logical type' problem", but the utility
    of using "information" more widely than that is very clear if you look
    into it. Or consider this: does any material thing not inform anyone
    who studies it? It does not refer to anything other than itself,
    but it is the absolute ultimate authority on itself. This view is
    the basis of Roy Frieden's work as mentioned in the message I sent
    earlier today. And there are other reasons for considering material
    structure as information -- ask any physicist. Yes, this is different
    from the more common concept, but the similarities are so important that
    any risk of confusion is far outweighed. There is more on this on my
    webpages "Physical Information" http://www.ii01.org/physics.html and
    "Psychological Information" http://www.ii01.org/psych.html

    -- 
    Robin Faichney
    Get your Meta-Information from http://www.ii01.org
    (CAUTION: contains philosophy, may cause heads to spin)
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 02 2001 - 14:15:03 BST