RE: memes- remember them?

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Tue Apr 24 2001 - 13:49:10 BST

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: Levels of explanation (was Re: Determinism)"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA27980 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 24 Apr 2001 13:53:26 +0100
    Subject: RE: memes- remember them?
    Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 08:49:10 -0400
    x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu
    x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
    To: "memetics list" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Message-ID: <20010424124937.AAA20026@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On 04/24/01 04:59, Vincent Campbell said this-

    >Calling von Daniken a fraud might lead to legal action, if he saw it.

    He's certainly a loonie. Fraud implies illicit gains and a motivated
    activity, so, legally, he might not be, but then again, he may have
    started some businesses that could be called fraudulent.

    Just because a guy is wrong don't necessarily make him a fraud.

    Look at me, well, a tenth of the time....

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 24 2001 - 14:00:26 BST