Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id CAA12720 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 19 Apr 2001 02:19:41 +0100 User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.0 (1513) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 21:16:14 -0400 Subject: Re: Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science From: William Benzon <bbenzon@mindspring.com> To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Message-ID: <B703B49D.8B3F%bbenzon@mindspring.com> In-Reply-To: <F333wSimD3JkUwWpSWe0000c12c@hotmail.com> Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
on 4/18/01 6:09 PM, Scott Chase at ecphoric@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> From: "J. R. Molloy" <jr@shasta.com>
>> Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
>> To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
>> Subject: Re: Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science
>> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 08:50:21 -0700
>>
>> From: "Vincent Campbell" <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
>>> Thanks we know...
>>
>> Sorry about the duplication.
>>
>>> (BTW, nice crack about religion...)
>>
>> Thank you. I consider religion one of the most dangerous and insidious meme
>> systems.
>>
> Religion is typically about following after entities which possibly don't
> even exist. Memetics could be in the same ballpark, but I wonder if this
> means memetics too is dangerous and insiduous.
Of course it is. Like creationism, it distracts otherwise intelligent
people from thinking in serious and useful ways.
:)
-- BB
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Apr 19 2001 - 02:24:51 BST