RE: AC/DC

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Wed Apr 18 2001 - 13:35:10 BST

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: Hidden women"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA10675 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 18 Apr 2001 13:38:37 +0100
    Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745DAF@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: AC/DC
    Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 13:35:10 +0100
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

            <And don't we mean, when we say 'digital computing', a _binary_
    process,
    > rather than just being related to digits, and when we say 'analog
    > computing' don't we mean a representational process?>
    >
            I've kept quite on this one, coz JR's point didn't sound right but I
    didn't have the terminology to address the question. But this sentence from
    Wade gets to what I was thinking (albeit in a much clearer way than I'd been
    thinking about it).

    Vincent

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 18 2001 - 13:41:43 BST