Re: about omniscience through memetics

From: Kenneth Van Oost (Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be)
Date: Sun Apr 15 2001 - 16:59:51 BST

  • Next message: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re: about omniscience through memetics"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id QAA03720 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 15 Apr 2001 16:25:17 +0100
    Message-ID: <006d01c0c5c5$314357a0$5b01bed4@default>
    From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <200104092335.f39NZnH06913@smtp.EUnet.yu>
    Subject: Re: about omniscience through memetics
    Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 17:59:51 +0200
    Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_006A_01C0C5D5.DE1507C0"
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
    X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

      ----- Original Message -----
      From: gvidan@EUnet.yu
      To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
      Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 1:41 AM
      Subject: Re: about omniscience through memetics

      I supposed that there must be selection pressure with regard to memes as there is a hierarchy in them. The existence of hierarchy should enable an appropriate setting for evolution. Besides, whenever you have hierarchy you have some sort of choice as well.
      I could be wrong, of course.
      About God: as God is above this hierarchy, and omniscient, and an absolute free agent, he must be your best shot at trying to eliminate the meme hypothesis.

      << You could of course argue about this one, but another way in seeing
      this would be to confine memes at their proper level.
      You exclude hierarchy this way, at least at the basic level of each meme-
      complex.
      Each meme has its place on its proper level of existence and in some sense
      they can 't get to another level. Memes which imply social structures
      can't get to the higher Intellectual level. Memes are seen here as actually
      structures. They only can get to a higher level of existence in another, than
      verbal form. In this way, you exclude also choise as a Intellectual tool, memes
      which imply organic knowledge cannot be choisen for because in a pure
      Intellectual way you can 't grasp all what the meme stands for.
      The space where the meme is, is far to unlimited to grasp it intellectualy.

      Just a thought, though !!
      I am wandering about, I believe....

      Best,

      Kenneth

      ( I am, because we are) under no selction pressure whatsoever

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 15 2001 - 16:33:24 BST