Re: The Tipping Point

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Fri Apr 13 2001 - 03:08:55 BST

  • Next message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Re: Is Suicide Contagious? A Case Study in Applied Memetics"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id DAA27135 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 13 Apr 2001 03:09:03 +0100
    From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 21:08:55 -0500
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: The Tipping Point
    Message-ID: <3AD61967.20283.B0C4E9@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <20010412105319.C1323@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On 12 Apr 2001, at 10:53, Robin Faichney wrote:

    > I'm starting a new thread here because I suspect Joe Dees hopes to
    > quietly drop his claim that the tipping point phenomenon demonstrates
    > "top-down causation", and I don't think he should be allowed to do so.
    > C'mon Joe, are you going to provide a full explanation of how that
    > works, or admit that it doesn't?? :-)
    >
    Au Contraire; although it is the simplest of analogies for a process
    so complex as to be recursive (the emergent self), which a pile of
    sand is not, the idea that the entire gestalt configuration of the pile
    of sand is not reduceable to its components taken in isolation, but
    must include their interrelations, and not just those immediately
    contiguous to each grain, but globally, across the entire pile, is
    essential to the explanation of what happens when the next grain
    falls. None of the grains in isolation could explain that, nor could
    all of them, minus their interactions, nor could all of them, if only
    contiguous interactions are considered in isolation from the
    dcomplex concatenation of relations and interrelations comprising
    the gestalt integrity of the pile system. Next, you're gonna be
    telling me that you can take the components of a TV apart and still
    watch BBC. What happens to those signals depends upon a
    global interrelation between those electronic components, and
    changing even one of them can alter the system beyond the point
    of signal receptivity.
    > --
    > Robin Faichney
    > Get your Meta-Information from http://www.ii01.org
    > (CAUTION: contains philosophy, may cause heads to spin)
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 03:12:07 BST