Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id GAA11990 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 7 Apr 2001 06:53:47 +0100 Subject: Re: Determinism Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2001 01:49:45 -0400 x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20010407054945.AAA2443@camailp.harvard.edu@[205.240.180.154]> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Hi Aaron Agassi -
>> "Truth is correspondence to reality in statements" becomes "Quality of
>> knowledge is correspondence to reality in statements." Thus, a high
>> quality of knowledge (a statement closer to truth) is more correspondent
>> to reality.
>>
>False! Because truth may or may not be known.
Truth, like Archimedes' paradox, is something we can only get half as
close to every time, then?
And all knowledge is only in degrees of distance?
That is my interpretation of what I think you are saying truth is,
although, honestly, I'm getting more and confused about whether or not
you've come halfway yet....
- Wade
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 07 2001 - 06:56:32 BST