Re: Determinism

From: Aaron Agassi (agassi@erols.com)
Date: Fri Apr 06 2001 - 16:22:12 BST

  • Next message: Chris Taylor: "Re: Determinism"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id QAA10504 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 6 Apr 2001 16:26:00 +0100
    Message-ID: <004f01c0bead$5ae5c080$5eaefea9@rcn.com>
    From: "Aaron Agassi" <agassi@erols.com>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <20010406123549.AAA6680@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]> <3ACDD9A9.23F45959@bioinf.man.ac.uk>
    Subject: Re: Determinism
    Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 11:22:12 -0400
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Chris Taylor" <Christopher.Taylor@man.ac.uk>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 10:58 AM
    Subject: Re: Determinism

    > OK. Firstly, scientific theories are provisional until death. Even
    > 'laws' in physics are still provisional, they are just assumed to be
    > closer to perfect predictive power; they may not even represent reality
    > as such, just predict it. No-one should dare to claim that they *truly*
    > know reality.

    Now you speak of knowledge, not truth. Truth, after all, may be unknown. But
    never provisional.

    >It's a bit like the two versions of the terminology in
    > stats - the 'real' (never truly known) and the 'sample'.
    >
    > Secondly, I've revised my view of the necessary ingredients for a mind,
    > and Robin beat me to it; some sort of input is necessary (after all I'd
    > be daft to say otherwise given that I view a mind as more or less
    > nothing but memes), but that's all (besides the brain). It would be
    > interesting to see what you get with no input though (ever pointed a
    > video camera at its own monitor?); the awful abuse cases that came close
    > to this are interesting, but messy.
    >
    > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    > Chris Taylor (chris@bioinf.man.ac.uk)
    > http://bioinf.man.ac.uk/ »people»chris
    > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 06 2001 - 16:29:13 BST