Re: Determinism

From: Aaron Agassi (agassi@erols.com)
Date: Fri Apr 06 2001 - 00:25:09 BST

  • Next message: Aaron Agassi: "Re: Determinism"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id AAA08086 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 6 Apr 2001 00:32:11 +0100
    Message-ID: <022e01c0be27$a8934680$5eaefea9@rcn.com>
    From: "Aaron Agassi" <agassi@erols.com>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <20010405225028.AAA2185@camailp.harvard.edu@[205.240.180.68]>
    Subject: Re: Determinism
    Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 19:25:09 -0400
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
    To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 6:50 PM
    Subject: Re: Determinism

    > Hi Aaron Agassi -
    >
    > >> >Knowledge of the truth, however, is never certain.
    > >>
    > >> Ah, but 'knowledge of the truth', is, to me, science.
    > >
    > >Then your definitions, I hope, are provisional! Because Science is only
    the
    > >quest for truth. Knowledge, such as it is, the output there of.
    > >
    > >
    > >>Mixing terms
    > >> around, 'never certain' could easily be substituted for 'provisional'
    in
    > >> its "serving only for the time being" sense, thus, 'science, [however]
    is
    > >> provisional'....
    > >
    > >Science, yes, truth, no.
    >
    > I fail, here, to see where you disagree with me, although, for some
    > reason, perhaps the cruel and relentless pressure we all give each other
    > here, I thought you did....
    >
    > Sorting and juggling most all terms, we come up with 'knowledge of the
    > truth is provisional' where we both reside, I strongly suspect, in
    > languid commonality.
    >
    > The provisions of science, however, are filling and enduring, teaching us
    > to fish, whereas the provisions of belief are wists in a fading morn,
    > offering one in a basket.
    >
    > It is what is done with this knowledge, and how far it is allowed to go,
    > that most concerns me in my day to day blinks at what's out there. Who
    > calls the basket 'truth', and who crawls for bait.
    >
    > - Wade
    >
    Truth itself, be it known or unknown, cannot be provisional unless objective
    reality is also provisional.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 06 2001 - 00:35:00 BST