RE: taboos

From: Lawrence DeBivort (debivort@umd5.umd.edu)
Date: Mon Apr 02 2001 - 16:05:23 BST

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: The Demise of a Meme"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id QAA19559 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 2 Apr 2001 16:06:12 +0100
    From: "Lawrence DeBivort" <debivort@umd5.umd.edu>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: taboos
    Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 11:05:23 -0400
    Message-ID: <NEBBKOADILIOKGDJLPMAIEONCBAA.debivort@umd5.umd.edu>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
    Importance: Normal
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
    In-Reply-To: <20010402143447.AAA16167@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    -----Original Message-----
    From: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk [mailto:fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk]On Behalf
    Of Wade T.Smith
    Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 10:35 AM
    To: memetics list
    Subject: RE: taboos

    On 04/02/01 10:21, Lawrence DeBivort said this-

    >One could easily imagine a situation in which a subliminal signal that is
    >broadcast is picked up consciously by some, unconsciously by some, and not
    >at all by others; the first group simply is more perceptive, attentive, or
    >alert to weak signals than the others. So a subliminal signal might be
    >'caught' consciously by some, affect some unconsciously, and be entirely
    >missed by others.

    Wade:
    Granted some people might detect a flash frame left in a hastily edited
    TV commercial- but _not granted_ that, they, or anyone else's behavior
    upon apprehending this flash frame would be altered in any way.

    LdB:
    Agreed. That is what needs to be investigated.

    <snip>

    Wade:
    But, perhaps not- the republican ad, for instance, is easily explained (I
    have experience in video production and editing) as a too-quickly edited
    and proofed chyron effect. That is what it looked like to me, and still
    looks like to me.

    LdB: What is a chyron?

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 02 2001 - 16:08:55 BST