Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id PAA19072 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 2 Apr 2001 15:41:59 +0100 Subject: RE: taboos Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 10:37:47 -0400 x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> To: "memetics list" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20010402143749.AAA17714@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
On 04/02/01 10:11, Lawrence DeBivort said this-
>I would think subliminal communications and influence would
>be fairly simple to test under rigorous conditions. The effect, if there is
>one, has significant implications for memetics. Does anyone know of such
>research being carried out?
They are, they have been, and in every instance the research has come up
empty.
Here's a place to start-
http://www.utexas.edu/ftp/coc/adv/research/biblio/Subliminal.html
- Wade
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 02 2001 - 15:45:00 BST