Re: The Demise of a Meme

From: Scott Chase (ecphoric@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Mar 31 2001 - 07:31:50 BST

  • Next message: Scott Chase: "Re: The Demise of a Meme"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id HAA11510 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 31 Mar 2001 07:35:59 +0100
    X-Originating-IP: [209.240.221.62]
    From: "Scott Chase" <ecphoric@hotmail.com>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: The Demise of a Meme
    Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 01:31:50 -0500
    Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
    Message-ID: <F203ajWSQ2hExHA3jE200019ee2@hotmail.com>
    X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Mar 2001 06:31:50.0681 (UTC) FILETIME=[44D6B890:01C0B9AC]
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    >From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >Subject: Re: The Demise of a Meme
    >Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 14:48:57 +0100
    >
    >On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 01:03:15PM +0100, Vincent Campbell wrote:
    > >
    > > <That "processes by which cultural information is transmitted" bit
    > > is
    > > > rubbish. At the most fundamental level, the processes are very
    >simple,
    > > > and are roughly similar for all memes, religious, scientific or
    >whatever.
    > > > If you want to know why people are susceptible to irrational beliefs,
    >on
    > > > the other hand, the answer lies in psychology, not memetics. But then
    > > > psychology wouldn't give you such scope to display your prejudice,
    > > > would it?>
    > > >
    > > The processes are very simple and similar are they- how do you know?
    > > Isn't that what memetics is about, exploring the processes of cultural
    > > transmission, trying to identify them. That's what I think it's about,
    > > perhaps that's where our disagreements have their roots.
    >
    >I don't particularly believe in memetics as a science, and I consequently
    >don't care much what those who do, think it's about. I'm with Dennett in
    >seeing it as being primarily of philosophical interest.
    >
    >I said "at the most fundamental level". What we have is transmission of
    >information from one brain to another via behaviour and artefacts. It
    >really is that simple -- if you disagree, please explain why.
    >
    > > Irrational beliefs
    > > are a good place to start because we know that people don't believe them
    > > because they are genuinely true-
    >
    >Some beliefs are held because most other people around hold them,
    >and it's easier socially just to fit in, rather than question them.
    >There are doubtless many other "bad" reasons to hold beliefs. Why you
    >think this is better tackled by looking at the transmission of cultural
    >information, than by psychology, defeats me.
    >
    > > not in the why of those beliefs which, of
    > > course, is a question for psychology- but in the how of transmission
    >from
    > > person to person, and the why of particular beliefs over others.
    >
    >The "how of transmission" I described above. I can't imagine why you
    >think the "why of particular beliefs over others" is a matter for memetics
    >rather than psychology.
    >
    > > In other
    > > words, given two equally false beliefs, why does one become a global
    >belief,
    > > and the other a local or even idiosyncratic one?
    >
    >That's for psychology, social anthropology, etc. to answer. The
    >transmission of the information is a "no-brainer". The question is,
    >why does it take root in the individual brain.
    >
    >Regarding all that followed in this message, sometimes the baiting of the
    >rabidly anti-religious just gets unbearably tedious, like here and now,
    >which is why I'm dropping it. You're welcome to any consequent feeling
    >of victory. You may even crow a little, and I probably won't bother to
    >respond. For various obvious reasons, I think we'd do better to focus
    >more closely on memetics.
    >
    >
    I'd chime in with the distinction betwen being rabidly anti-religious and
    being non-religious if I thought it wouldn't fan the flames even more.

    _________________________________________________________________
    Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 31 2001 - 07:38:39 BST