Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id OAA07810 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 30 Mar 2001 14:07:38 +0100 Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 13:54:37 +0100 To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk Subject: Re: The Demise of a Meme Message-ID: <20010330135437.A1541@reborntechnology.co.uk> References: <E14ixdz-0000FD-00@gaea> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i In-Reply-To: <E14ixdz-0000FD-00@gaea>; from dbrooker@clara.co.uk on Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 01:04:43PM +0100 From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 01:04:43PM +0100, Douglas Brooker wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 10:21:35AM +0100, Douglas Brooker wrote:
> >
> > perhaps slightly related, what is the difference in memetic language,
>
> > between a characteristic of a person or group, and information which
>
> > they may have stored in their minds or body?
>
> AND THEN R FAICHEY ANSWERED:
>
> There isn't one.
>
> ---------
>
> So does this mean than when I look at you you are a part of my identity?
Your view of me is, yes.
> What is the effect on your identity of having been looked at?
Absolutely none. If I think I'm being looked at, then that thought is
obviously part of me.
-- Robin Faichney Get your Meta-Information from http://www.ii01.org (CAUTION: contains philosophy, may cause heads to spin)=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 30 2001 - 14:10:39 BST