Re: The Demise of a Meme

From: Robin Faichney (robin@reborntechnology.co.uk)
Date: Fri Mar 30 2001 - 11:47:29 BST

  • Next message: Douglas Brooker: "RE: The Demise of a Meme"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA07270 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 30 Mar 2001 12:38:41 +0100
    Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 11:47:29 +0100
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: The Demise of a Meme
    Message-ID: <20010330114729.A1230@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745D35@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: inline
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
    In-Reply-To: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745D35@inchna.stir.ac.uk>; from v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk on Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 10:53:30AM +0100
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 10:53:30AM +0100, Vincent Campbell wrote:
    > <Regarding all that followed in this message, sometimes the baiting
    > of the
    > > rabidly anti-religious just gets unbearably tedious, like here and now,
    > > which is why I'm dropping it. You're welcome to any consequent feeling
    > > of victory. You may even crow a little, and I probably won't bother to
    > > respond. For various obvious reasons, I think we'd do better to focus
    > > more closely on memetics.>
    > >
    > I'd disagree with most of the rest of this post, but I'd agree we've
    > probably worn out the current thread a bit.

    I only meant to drop religion. I'm sorry you decided to delete what
    preceded that paragraph, which was about memetics.

    > I am curious though- to return more explicitly to memetics, how you
    > can view psychology as the discipline most appropriate for investigating
    > culture and memetics as appropriate for investigating individual minds.

    I don't, and I've no idea how you could have gotten that impression.
    Re individuals, psychology is infinitely superior, and almost certainly
    will remain so. As I said, I don't really "believe in" memetics as a
    science, and so I don't see it as suitable for investigating culture
    either. As I said (again), it's primarily of philosophical interest.

    -- 
    Robin Faichney
    Get your Meta-Information from http://www.ii01.org
    (CAUTION: contains philosophy, may cause heads to spin)
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 30 2001 - 12:44:32 BST