Re: The Demise of a Meme

From: Lloyd Robertson (hawkeye@rongenet.sk.ca)
Date: Wed Mar 28 2001 - 19:44:26 BST

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: The Demise of a Meme"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA12755 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 28 Mar 2001 19:48:56 +0100
    Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20010328124426.00833b40@mailhost.rongenet.sk.ca>
    X-Sender: hawkeye@mailhost.rongenet.sk.ca
    X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32)
    Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 12:44:26 -0600
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk, memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    From: Lloyd Robertson <hawkeye@rongenet.sk.ca>
    Subject: Re: The Demise of a Meme
    In-Reply-To: <3AC21572.7462F3FC@bioinf.man.ac.uk>
    References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745D2D@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    At 05:46 PM 28/03/01 +0100, Chris Taylor wrote:
    >
    >As for religion (thankyou Vincent, please accept my sincere sympathy for
    >what must have been an unbearable time for you and yours), I used to be
    >a hardcore antireligious person, but now I'm not. I'm not religious, but
    >I do see that it's a lot easier to use religion to indoctrinate kids
    >with morality (memetic engineering ain't just an ad thing) before they
    >know enough to resist (and then they spend the rest of their lives
    >justifying what they already think, as do we all) than it is to try to
    >teach the golden rule and Kant. The kids will often abandon religion
    >(like I did with Catholicism) but the fundamental behavioural prejudices
    >it has scored in there will remain, with 'resident's advantage'.
    >
    The problem is that the abandonment of the religion (as will happen with
    many intelligent youth) will often lead the reverse of what you
    experienced, an abandonment of the moral principles that were tied to the
    religious teaching. Why bother being "good" if the big guy in the sky that
    rewards whatever version of goodness we have been taught doesn't exist?

    It seems to me that pre-operational children will do what is "right" (as
    defined by their parents) if those parents consistantly structure their
    experiences so that it is in their best interest to do so. That pattern
    then leads to the fundamental pro-social behavioral prejudices of which you
    speak without the danger that the moral principles will get thrown out once
    the "big lie" is discovered.

    Lloyd

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 28 2001 - 19:54:43 BST