RE: The Demise of a Meme

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Wed Mar 28 2001 - 14:53:46 BST

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: The Demise of a Meme"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id OAA11447 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 28 Mar 2001 14:57:26 +0100
    Subject: RE: The Demise of a Meme
    Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 08:53:46 -0500
    x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu
    x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
    To: "memetics list" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Message-ID: <20010328135354.AAA3134@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On 03/28/01 07:53, Vincent Campbell said this-

    >and to try
    >and rid oneself of_all_memes is in my view a dreadful thing not a positive
    >thing.

    I only meant (only...), that memelessness is a necessary condition for
    the eureka moment- that this act of creation cannot and will not happen
    in a swim of memes (namely preconditions and preconceptions), and, since
    the creative moment is a 'good' thing (there, I said it...), memelessness
    is a good thing.

    Impossible to achieve for more than a moment, of course.

    And, yes, if anyone could come up with an experiment to determine
    memelessness that is humane, I'd love to know about it. IMHO, there is no
    such thing, in my set of ethics.

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 28 2001 - 15:00:05 BST