Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id BAA09482 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 28 Mar 2001 01:35:25 +0100 Subject: Re: Bi-and Tri- and Quatr- and Quintifurcation Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 19:31:47 -0500 x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20010328003148.AAA4220@camailp.harvard.edu@[205.240.180.12]> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Hi Joe E. Dees -
>Now we have:
>
>1) Provisional truths
>2) Apodictically certain (self-evident) truths
>2) Falsehoods
>4) Untestable assertions (beliefs)
>5) Meaningless assertions (pseudoassertions)
>
>Any others?
_If_ "Every fact is backed up by the entire universe" is a definition, if
you will, of a scientific fact (merely 'fact' in my bifurcation), _then_
all of your list above is fiction, (or 'false' in my bifurcation), with
the proviso that, hmmm, it may be not altogether prudent to put your #2
among the fictions, because, nothing can be in the entire universe at
once to back them all up- the entire universe, by virtue of space and
time, is unknowable at any one moment.
But every act of language produces fiction unless it's analogous to a
self-evident truth, such as mathematics possesses.
And, yes, what about nothing?
The entirely unsensible is also backed up by the entire universe.
- Wade
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 28 2001 - 01:37:59 BST