Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA03575 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 26 Mar 2001 19:37:36 +0100 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 18:42:12 +0100 To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk Subject: Re: The Demise of a Meme Message-ID: <20010326184212.A835@reborntechnology.co.uk> References: <20010326172430.AAA17140@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i In-Reply-To: <20010326172430.AAA17140@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>; from wade_smith@harvard.edu on Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 12:24:25PM -0500 From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 12:24:25PM -0500, Wade T.Smith wrote:
> On 03/26/01 10:11, Robin Faichney said this-
>
> >In your's, science is good and non-science bad.
>
> Nope, I really don't use 'good' and 'bad', and you will find no instance
> where I have.
I didn't say you used "good" and "bad", I said that for you science is
good and non-science bad. Ie, not necessarily these specific words, but
what they mean. Or else, what do you mean?
-- Robin Faichney Get your Meta-Information from http://www.ii01.org (CAUTION: contains philosophy, may cause heads to spin)=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 26 2001 - 19:46:23 BST