Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA23059 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 23 Mar 2001 18:41:12 GMT Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 14:49:30 +0000 To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk Subject: Re: The Demise of a Meme Message-ID: <20010323144930.A567@reborntechnology.co.uk> References: <20010323135713.AAA23171@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i In-Reply-To: <20010323135713.AAA23171@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>; from wade_smith@harvard.edu on Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 08:57:12AM -0500 From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 08:57:12AM -0500, Wade T.Smith wrote:
> On 03/23/01 05:46, Robin Faichney said this-
>
> >Was it really not perfectly obvious that I was differentiating between
> >varieties of Buddhism?
>
> Of course it was. As I did between xianity and catholicism.
Then why did you ignore that distinction, even going so far as to
suggest that all Buddhists use prayer wheels?
> >Or do you just assume
> >that when you delete something from a reply, it's deleted from the
> >memories of the readers too?
>
> Why did you delete my "Can one be a buddhist without rubbing bellies?
> Sure."
Because I didn't want to make any comment on it.
-- Robin Faichney Get your Meta-Information from http://www.ii01.org (CAUTION: contains philosophy, may cause heads to spin)=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 23 2001 - 18:43:47 GMT