Re: The Demise of a Meme

From: Robin Faichney (robin@reborntechnology.co.uk)
Date: Fri Mar 23 2001 - 09:41:22 GMT

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: The Demise of a Meme"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id LAA20356 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 23 Mar 2001 11:08:22 GMT
    Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 09:41:22 +0000
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: The Demise of a Meme
    Message-ID: <20010323094122.A520@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    References: <20010322122152.AAA13805@camailp.harvard.edu@[205.240.180.87]> <20010322134110.B577@reborntechnology.co.uk> <3ABA0D52.2F25FE03@bioinf.man.ac.uk>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: inline
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
    In-Reply-To: <3ABA0D52.2F25FE03@bioinf.man.ac.uk>; from Christopher.Taylor@man.ac.uk on Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 02:33:54PM +0000
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 02:33:54PM +0000, Chris Taylor wrote:
    > > Observation without theory doesn't come within
    > > a million miles of being scientific.
    >
    > It's interesting though (and this is an aside, not a comment on the main
    > thrust) round where I am, there's a lot of this genome-wide gene
    > expression data washing about, with people essentially fishing for
    > interesting stuff and only then coming up with a theory to take account
    > of it (if at all - all the big pharmers want is more drug targets to
    > treat [not cure] illness, but perhaps they're more engineers than
    > scientists). Rest assured that this industrial-scale arse-first approach
    > is not without critics, but I think observation (in a less focused form)
    > does predate theory formation in scientific investigation (although the
    > two are both required obviously, otherwise you just have
    > superstition/religion).

    That both are required was my only point. I intended no implication
    as to order. But any sentient creature observes, by definition.
    Systematic theorising about observations is what makes science.
    Wade's meme-free observations don't come within a million miles of it.

    -- 
    Robin Faichney
    Get your Meta-Information from http://www.ii01.org
    (CAUTION: contains philosophy, may cause heads to spin)
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 23 2001 - 11:11:18 GMT