RE: The Demise of a Meme

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Fri Mar 23 2001 - 10:41:12 GMT

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: The Demise of a Meme"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id KAA20117 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 23 Mar 2001 10:44:19 GMT
    Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745D0B@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: The Demise of a Meme
    Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 10:41:12 -0000
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

            <*Professional* death, sure. That is the death (or
    non-proliferation) of
    > memes. This is entirely within the model as proposed by Hull (and to a
    > less-acceptable extent from a memetic perspective, Kuhn) of scientific
    > evolution. But none of the examples so far adduced shows the death of
    > anyone for scientific memes.>
    >
            I think it was a rhetorical point that people feel as strongly about
    scientific theories as they do about religious beliefs, or rather can do.

    >> Then of course there's Scopes monkey trial.

            <Nobody died, or even went to jail. And that was about a religious
    set of
    > memes, not scientific ones (anyone actually *seen* that textbook? It's
    > on the web somewhere in a law school site (search on Scopes trial). Not
    > exactly science so much as a triumphalist faith in progress. More
    > neo-Lamarckian than Darwinian.>
    >
            You think? I thought it was a show trial about the right to teach
    evolution. Darrow (a photo of whom at the trial adorns my office wall) had
    to turn to analysing the bible when his scientific witnesses were refused by
    the court. Again, the point being that people were prepared to risk jail
    and fines, and public outrage by defending science in the court room.

            Vincent

    > --
    > John Wilkins, Head, Communication Services, The Walter and Eliza Hall
    > Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia
    > Homo homini aut deus aut lupus - Erasmus of Rotterdam
    > <http://www.users.bigpond.com/thewilkins/darwiniana.html>
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 23 2001 - 10:47:01 GMT