RE: Toggling nature's auto-erase

From: Scott Chase (ecphoric@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Mar 16 2001 - 03:07:44 GMT

  • Next message: Scott Chase: "RE: Toggling nature's auto-erase"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id DAA22480 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 16 Mar 2001 03:11:24 GMT
    X-Originating-IP: [209.240.220.167]
    From: "Scott Chase" <ecphoric@hotmail.com>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: RE: Toggling nature's auto-erase
    Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 22:07:44 -0500
    Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
    Message-ID: <F33pktkzU5ZImwlcvNh0000204e@hotmail.com>
    X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Mar 2001 03:07:44.0914 (UTC) FILETIME=[4598B720:01C0ADC6]
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    >From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
    >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >To: "memetics list" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    >Subject: RE: Toggling nature's auto-erase
    >Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:11:42 -0500
    >
    >On 03/15/01 09:19, Vincent Campbell said this-
    >
    > >Are you saying here that science is meme-free?
    >
    >Yes.
    >
    >Scientists are another matter.
    >
    >
    It likely depends on what is being called a meme and how far one extends
    memetics as a theoretical system. If memetics is concerned with superficial
    quirks of human behavior and the intention is accounting for a strictly
    limited subset of behavioral phenomena (imitation, trends or whatever) there
    would not be as much contention and scientific exploits would probably be
    excluded (for the most part) from the venue of memetics. Going deeper would
    be the history of ideas aspect which would add a smidgen of historicism into
    the mix and extend memetics a little further, encompassing more than mere
    hula hoops and hairstyles.

    Then the theory of mind folks come along and hyperextend memetics and
    increase the chances of a sprain or tendon tear. Here all behavior is
    explained by memetics, thus none is explained by memetics or something to
    that effect. It becomes a theory of everything.

    _________________________________________________________________
    Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 16 2001 - 03:13:44 GMT