Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution

From: Kenneth Van Oost (Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be)
Date: Sat Feb 24 2001 - 10:45:53 GMT

  • Next message: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re: Lesser genes than expected"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id KAA01978 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 24 Feb 2001 10:13:16 GMT
    Message-ID: <000901c09e4f$15c04120$d709bed4@default>
    From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <5.0.2.1.0.20010217113823.021498a0@pop3.htcomp.net> <5.0.2.1.0.20010218171310.0212e8a0@pop3.htcomp.net>
    Subject: Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution
    Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 11:45:53 +0100
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Mark Mills <mmills@htcomp.net>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 12:15 AM
    Subject: Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution

    > Kenneth
    At 09:57 PM 2/18/01 +0100, you wrote:
    Ideas are the phenotypes of neural-memes, memory organization (neural-meme
    based) is the genotype.
    Wouldn 't it be better to use the viral- meme !?
    If so, it isn't obvious to me. Why does this suggest itself to you?

    << I don 't know, it seems logical to me, to imply the possibility that
    viral
    memes, in whatever way, are responded to by the immune system.
    I postulate that the immune system fights not only bacterial infection but
    also works upon a ( more) neuro(bio)logical/ psychological/ physiological
    level. Only those memes which do act as a causality between gene and
    its mutation should count for immune system reponses_ in a sense like
    pseudo- genes. In my book, the causality here is a (re)action.
    A change in the us surrounding environment causes a change ( a reaction)
    in the needs ( phenotypic or genotypic) which we acquire to stay alive,
    which in turn causes a change ( we (re)act upon those changes) in our
    behavior.

    If you do you can include the immune system in your concept and the
    passing of ideas to soma and germline wouldn 't be a problem at all.
    This sounds interesting. Can you describe it more?

    << Of course, but it is not that mush different of what you already read
    upon this list.
    This is pure speculation, but IMO there is a possible connection between
    the immune system and mental states, with that respect that the immune
    system has to have what you should could call a ' mind variant '.
    Go back to what I defend here upon this list. That is_we are born with a
    germ- line to memes ( a memetic starterset) which we get from our parents.
    Genetic based or not, it doesn 't matter.

    If we grow up and we come across ideas, treats, promises,..( than seen
    as virusses) which would upset our ' normal ' neurological fysiology, than
    already enhanced troughout that period of time ( learning, experience,..),
    than our ' mind immune system ' acts upon these accordingly.
    Viral ideas/ memes do possess IMO actualy what you should could call
    epitopes, I prefer to call them ' temptations lines ' or ' hook lines ',
    which
    are responded to by anti- bodies.
    As by religion the temptations/ hooks are legio, these are the virusses
    ( sex/ hate/ egoism/...) Built in anti- bodies are hell, sin, being a bad
    person,
    crime, unemployment,...

    Viral ideas are like true infections which get responded to by anti- bodies
    of a memetic nature.
    If we now take this proposition serious than IMO mind virsusses are
    as " real " as real diseases germs which like other diseases can be trans-
    ferred to the germline to genes. Ideas about religion ( or the ones to
    contradict them) can in that way be passed to soma and germline and in
    turn to the progeny.
    Let me remind you of a link...
    www.annals.org/issues/v131n11/full/199912070-00019.html
    " Memes " as Infectious Agents in Psychosomatic Illness by Stephen Ross.

    Vincent or Robin wrote, that noone is born in a religion, but in fact IMO,
    that ain 't totally true. You " are" born as a Christian if you were born
    in
    the midst of the Christian community, and you will be a Christian whole
    your life if you don 't break free from your surroundings/ family/
    community.
    If you do, you " react " upon notified changes which changed your per-
    sonal needs, or the other way round....see the New Born Christians.
    IMO, each of us is born with a specific set of memes ( species or commu-
    nity or family bound) which is related to those categories (genetic or me-
    metic based) and still IMO, you cannot disgard that. You only can contra-
    dict, work against those things inbedded in your germline to genes and -
    memes in the face of experience, learning and skepticism.

    Hopes this helps,

    Best,

    Kenneth

    ( I am, because we are)

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 24 2001 - 10:15:32 GMT