Charleton Heston sprech

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Wed Feb 21 2001 - 22:11:06 GMT

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Fwd: Charleton Heston speech"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id WAA20398 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 21 Feb 2001 22:07:19 GMT
    From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 16:11:06 -0600
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Charleton Heston sprech
    Message-ID: <3A93E89A.10088.143B3B@localhost>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    A speech Chaleton Heston gave to the Harvard Law School Forum
    > For 50 years, the Harvard Law School Forum has been sponsoring
    speeches by > luminaries ranging from Fidel Castro to Gerald Ford to
    Dr. Ruth. Sometimes > the speeches have generated a bit of media
    coverage, sometimes not. But > one > given last month by Charlton
    Heston has taken on a life of its own. > Heston, > the actor and
    conservative activist, delivered a stem-winder to about 200 > listeners
    about "a cultural war that's about to hijack your birthright to > think and
    say what resides in your heart." "He knew he was coming to a > liberal
    environment, and clearly a group of his listeners was conservative > and
    another was more liberal," said David Christopherson, president of the >
    forum. "About half respectfully challenged him during the questions. It >
    generated a lot of debate around the campus. But what's happened
    caught us > off-guard." What happened was Rush Limbaugh's radio talk
    show. On March > 15, > Limbaugh read the entire speech on the air,
    only to find himself bombarded > with thousands of requests for a copy
    of it. The same thing happened at > Harvard Law. "We couldn't keep up
    with all the requests," said Mike Chmura > at Harvard. "It really didn't
    have legs and might have been forgotten if > Mr.Limbaugh hadn't
    decided to deliver it." > > Winning the Cultural War' Charlton Heston's
    Speech to the Harvard Law > School > Forum February 16, 1999 > >
    I remember my son when he was five, explaining to his kindergarten
    class > what > his father did for a living. "My Daddy," he said, "pretends
    to be people." > > And there have been quite a few of them: Prophets
    from the Old and New > Testaments, a couple of Christian saints,
    generals of various nationalities > and different centuries, several kings,
    three American presidents, a French > cardinal and two geniuses,
    including Michelangelo. If you want the ceiling > re-painted I'll do my
    best. There always seem to be a lot of different > fellows up here. I'm
    never sure which one of them gets to talk. Right > now, > I guess I'm the
    guy. > > As I pondered our visit tonight it struck me: If my Creator gave
    me the > gift > to connect you with the hearts and minds of those great
    men, then I want to > use that same gift now to re-connect you with
    your own sense of liberty of > your own freedom of thought ... your own
    compass for what is right. > Dedicating the memorial at Gettysburg,
    Abraham Lincoln said of America, "We > are now engaged in a great
    Civil War, testing whether this nation or any > nation so conceived and
    so dedicated can long endure. " Those words are > true again. I believe
    that we are again engaged in a great civil war, a > cultural war that's
    about to hijack your birthright to think and say what > resides in your
    heart. I fear you no longer trust the pulsing lifeblood of > liberty inside
    you ... the stuff that made this country rise from > wilderness > into the
    miracle that it is. > > Let me back up. About a year ago I became
    president of the National Rifle > Association, which protects the right to
    keep and bear arms. I ran for > office, I was elected, and now I serve ...
    I serve as a moving target for > the > media who've called me everything
    from "ridiculous" and "duped" to a > "brain-injured, senile, crazy old
    man." I know ... I'm pretty old... but I > sure am not senile. As I have
    stood in the crosshairs of those who target > Second Amendment
    freedoms, I've realized that firearms are not the only > issue. No, it's
    much, much bigger than that. I've come to understand that > a > cultural
    war is raging across our land, in which, with Orwellian fervor, > certain
    acceptable thoughts and speech are mandated. For example, I >
    marched > for civil rights with Dr. King in 1963 - long before
    Hollywood found it > fashionable. But when I told an audience last year
    that white pride is > just > as valid as black pride or red pride or anyone
    else's pride, they called me > a > racist. I've worked with brilliantly
    talented homosexuals all my life. > But > when I told an audience that
    gay rights should extend no further than your > rights or my rights, I was
    called a homophobe. I served in World War II > against the Axis
    powers. But during a speech, when I drew an analogy > between >
    singling out innocent Jews and singling out innocent gun owners, I was >
    called > an anti-Semite. Everyone I know knows I would never raise a
    closed fist > against my country. But when I asked an audience to
    oppose this cultural > persecution, I was compared to Timothy
    McVeigh. From Time magazine to > friends and colleagues, they're
    essentially saying, "Chuck, how dare you > speak your mind. You are
    using language not authorized for public > consumption!" But I am not
    afraid. If Americans believed in political > correctness, we'd still be King
    George's boys - subjects bound to the > British > crown. In his book,
    "The End of Sanity," Martin Gross writes that > "blatantly irrational
    behavior is rapidly being established as the norm in > almost every area
    of human endeavor. There seem to be new customs, new > rules, and
    newanti-intellectual theories regularly foisted on us from every > >
    direction. Underneath, the nation is roiling. Americans know something >
    without a name is undermining the nation, turning the mind mushy when it
    > comes to separating truth from falsehood and right from wrong. And
    they > don't like it. > > " Let me read a few examples. At Antioch
    college in Ohio, young men > seeking intimacy with a coed must get
    verbal permission at each step of > the > process from kissing to petting
    to final copulation ... all clearly > spelled out in a printed college
    directive. In New Jersey, despite the > death of several patients
    nationwide who had been infected by dentists > who > had concealed
    their AIDS --- the state commissioner announced that health > >
    providers who are HIV-positive need not..... need not ..... tell their >
    patients that they are infected. At William and Mary, students tried to >
    change the name of the school team "The Tribe" because it was
    supposedly > insulting to local Indians, only to learn that authentic
    Virginia chiefs > truly like the name. In San Francisco, city fathers
    passed an ordinance > protecting the rights of transvestites to cross-
    dress on the job, and for > transsexuals to have separate toilet facilities
    while undergoing sex change > > surgery. In New York City, kids who
    don't speak a word of Spanish have > been > placed in bilingual classes
    to learn their three R's in Spanish solely > because their last names
    sound Hispanic. At the University of > Pennsylvania, > in a state where
    thousands died at Gettysburg opposing slavery, the > president of that
    college officially set up segregated dormitory space for > black students.
    > > Yeah, I know ... that's out of bounds now. Dr. King said "Negroes."
    > Jimmy > Baldwin and most of us on the March said "black." But it's a
    no-no now. > For me, hyphenated identities are awkward ... particularly
    > "Native-American." I'm a Native American, for God's sake. I also
    happen > to > be a blood-initiated brother of the Miniconjou Sioux. On
    my wife's side, > my grandson is a thirteenth generation native
    American... with a capital > letter on "American." Finally, just last month
    ..... David Howard, head of > the Washington D.C. Office of Public
    Advocate, used the word "niggardly" > while talking to colleagues about
    budgetary matters. Of course, > "niggardly" > means stingy or scanty. >
    > But within days Howard was forced to publicly apologize and resign.
    As > columnist Tony Snow wrote: "David Howard got fired because
    some people in > public employ were morons who, (a) didn't know the
    meaning of niggardly, > (b) didn't know how to use a dictionary to
    discover the meaning, and, (c) > actually demanded that he apologize for
    their ignorance." What does all > of > this mean? It means that telling us
    what to think has evolved into > telling > us what to say , so telling us
    what to do can't be far behind. Before > you > claim to be a champion
    of free thought, tell me: Why did political > correctness originate on
    America's campuses? And why do you continue to > tolerate it? Why
    do you, who're supposed to debate ideas, surrender to > their
    suppression? Let's be honest. Who here thinks your professors can >
    say what they really believe? It scares me to death, and should scare you
    > too, that the superstition of political correctness rules the halls of >
    reason. You are the best and the brightest. You, here in the fertile >
    cradle of American academia, here in the castle of learning on the
    Charles > River, you are the cream. But I submit that you, and your
    counterparts > across the land, are the most socially conformed and
    politically silenced > generation since Concord Bridge. And as long as
    you validate that ... > and > abide it ...you are - by your grandfathers'
    standards - cowards. > > Here's another example. Right now at more
    than one major university, > Second Amendment scholars and
    researchers are being told to shut up about > their findings or they'll lose
    their jobs. Why? Because their research > findings would undermine big-
    city mayor's pending lawsuits that seek to > extort hundreds of millions
    of dollars from firearm manufacturers. I > don't > care what you think
    about guns. But if you are not shocked at that, I am > shocked at you.
    Who will guard the raw material of unfettered ideas, if > not you? Who
    will defend the core value of academia, if you supposed > soldiers of
    free thought and expression lay down your arms and plead, > "Don't
    shoot me." If you talk about race, it does not make you a racist. > > If
    you see distinctions between the genders, it does not make you a >
    sexist. > If you think critically about a denomination, it does not make
    you > anti-religion. If you accept but don't celebrate homosexuality, it
    does > not > make you a homophobe. Don't let America's universities
    continue to serve > as > incubators for this rampant epidemic of new
    McCarthyism. But what can you > do? How can anyone prevail against
    such pervasive social subjugation? > The > answer's been here all along.
    I learned it 36 years ago, on the steps of > the Lincoln Memorial in
    Washington D.C., standing with Dr. Martin Luther > King and two
    hundred thousand people. You simply ... disobey. > > Peaceably, yes.
    Respectfully, of course. Nonviolently, absolutely. But > when told how
    to think or what to say or how to behave, we don't. We > disobey
    social protocol that stifles and stigmatizes personal freedom. I > >
    learned the awesome power of disobedience from Dr. King ... who
    learned it > > from Gandhi, and Thoreau, and Jesus, and every other
    great man who led > those in the right against those with the might.
    Disobedience is in our > DNA. We feel innate kinship with that
    disobedient spirit that tossed tea > into Boston Harbor, that sent
    Thoreau to jail, that refused to sit in the > back of the bus, that protested
    a war in Viet Nam. In that same spirit, I > > am asking you to disavow
    cultural correctness with massive disobedience of > > rogue authority,
    social directives, and onerous laws that weaken personal > freedom. But
    be careful ... it hurts. Disobedience demands that you put > yourself at
    risk. Dr. King stood on lots of balconies. You must be > willing to be
    humiliated ... to endure the modern-day equivalent of the > police dogs
    at Montgomery and the water cannons at Selma. You must be > willing
    to experience discomfort. I'm not complaining, but my own > decades >
    of social activism have taken their toll on me. > > Let me tell you a story.
    A few years back I heard about a rapper named > Ice-T who was
    selling a CD called "Cop Killer" celebrating ambushing and > murdering
    police officers. It was being marketed by none other than >
    Time/Warner, the biggest entertainment conglomerate in the world.
    Police > across the country were outraged. Rightfully so-at least one had
    been > murdered. But Time/Warner was stonewalling because the CD
    was a cash cow > for them, and the media were tiptoeing around it
    because the rapper was > black. I heard Time/Warner had a
    stockholders meeting scheduled in Beverly > > Hills. I owned some
    shares at the time, so I decided to attend. What I > did > > there was
    against the advice of my family and colleagues. I asked for the > floor.
    To a hushed room of a thousand average American stockholders, I >
    simply read the full lyrics of "Cop Killer"- every vicious, vulgar, >
    instructional word. > "I GOT MY 12 GAUGE SAWED OFF > I GOT
    MY HEADLIGHTS TURNED OFF > I'M ABOUT TO BUST
    SOME SHOTS OFF > I'M ABOUT TO DUST SOME COPS
    OFF..." > > It got worse, a lot worse. I won't read the rest of it to you.
    But trust > me, the room was a sea of shocked, frozen, blanched faces.
    The > Time/Warner > executives squirmed in their chairs and stared at
    their shoes. They hated > me for that. Then I delivered another volley of
    sick lyric brimming with > racist filth, where Ice-T fantasizes about
    sodomizing two 12-year old > nieces > of Al and Tipper Gore. "SHE
    PUSHED HER BUTT AGAINST MY ...." > > Well, I won't do to you
    here what I did to them. Let's just say I left > the > room in echoing
    silence. When I read the lyrics to the waiting press > corps, one of them
    said "We can't print that." "I know," I replied, "but > Time/Warner's
    selling it." Two months later, Time/Warner terminated > Ice-T's
    contract. I'll never be offered another film by Warner's, or get > a > >
    good review from Time magazine. But disobedience means you must be
    > willing > > to act, not just talk. When a mugger sues his elderly victim
    for defending > > herself ... jam the switchboard of the district attorney's
    office. When > your university is pressured to lower standards until 80%
    of the students > > graduate with honors ... choke the halls of the board
    of regents. When an > 8-year-old boy pecks a girl's cheek on the
    playground and gets hauled into > court for sexual harassment ... march
    on that school and block its > doorways. When someone you elected is
    seduced by political power and > betrays you...petition them, oust them,
    banish them. When Time magazine's > cover portrays millennium nuts as
    deranged, crazy Christians holding a > cross > as it did last month ...
    boycott their magazine and the products it > advertises. > > So that this
    nation may long endure, I urge you to follow in the hallowed > footsteps
    of the great disobediences of history that freed exiles, > founded >
    religions, defeated tyrants, and yes, in the hands fan aroused rabble in >
    arms and a few great men, by God's grace, built this country. If Dr. >
    King > were here, I think he would agree.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 21 2001 - 22:09:39 GMT