Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution

From: Kenneth Van Oost (Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be)
Date: Sun Feb 18 2001 - 20:51:46 GMT

  • Next message: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA07041 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 18 Feb 2001 20:17:34 GMT
    Message-ID: <002a01c099ec$b0ee1b20$a300bed4@default>
    From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <002b01c099a3$1abeba40$0d0fbed4@default> <3A8FAB9E.16588.104052@localhost>
    Subject: Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution
    Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 21:51:46 +0100
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Ok Joe, I go back to the drawingboard !!

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2001 6:01 PM
    Subject: Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution

    > On 18 Feb 2001, at 10:57, joedees@bellsouth.net wrote:
    >
    > > On 18 Feb 2001, at 13:04, Kenneth Van Oost wrote:
    > >
    > > >
    > > > ----- Original Message -----
    > > > From: Mark Mills <mmills@htcomp.net>
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > > At 10:49 AM 2/17/01 -0800, you wrote:
    > > > > >But the idea of a memetic germ line is still a problem. Memory
    > > > > >organization does not pass directly from person to person, while
    > > > > >genes and chromosomes do pass directly from parent to child.
    > > > > Maybe the term 'ontogenetic replicator' would make more sense?
    > > > > That's the model I'm suggesting. Once ontogeny starts, the
    > > > > organism begins memorizing. The memory structures that can be
    > > > > replicated are memes. Consider the notion of an 'object-oriented
    > > > > database' with multiple levels of organization and the ability to
    > > > > bootstrap itself.
    > > > > That's the model I have in mind. An object-oriented
    > > > > datastructure
    > > > > that builds itself. The fact that cellular replication uses source
    > > > > DNA does and memetics uses sources itself does not change the
    > > > > parallel nature of the activity. I think the recent publication of
    > > > > human genome findings supports this objected oriented,
    > > > > bootstrapping datastructure concept. Both memes and genes use it.
    > > > > The difference is their substrates.
    > > >
    > > > Hi Mark,
    > > >
    > > > Same argument here for you as for Bill. Your ontogenetic replicator
    > > > concept seems to be following the lines of what I see as the fractal
    > > > structure of evolution....(L )amarckain/ (D )arwinian...and so
    > > > on...L/ D/ L / D/... Strange though, that having lesser genes than
    > > > expected had to come to this...but I like it !! Maybe I do not have
    > > > to stop thinking stuff like this after all...
    > > >
    > > Actually, what Mark is describing sounds a whole lot like
    > > autopoetic theory (AUTOPOEISIS AND COGNITION: THE
    > > REALIZATION OF THE LIVING, Maturana & Varela, 1980;
    > > PRINCIPLES OF BIOLOGICAL AUTONOMY, Varela, 1979).
    > Oh, I forgot to mention; autopoetic theory is Darwinian, not
    > Lamarckian.
    > >
    > > >
    > > > Best,
    > > >
    > > > Kenneth
    > > >
    > > > ( I am, because we are) back on track
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > =============================================================== This
    > > > was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of
    > > > Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For
    > > > information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see:
    > > > http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > ===============================================================
    > > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 18 2001 - 20:19:46 GMT