Re: realist-rationalist quad

From: lhousego@axa.com.au
Date: Tue Feb 13 2001 - 23:25:21 GMT

  • Next message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "South American Water-Boiling"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id WAA17305 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 13 Feb 2001 22:31:16 GMT
    From: <lhousego@axa.com.au>
    X-Lotus-FromDomain: NMH@NMHEXT@NMHDMZ
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Message-Id: <4A2569F2.007FE8EE.00@c2.nm.com.au>
    Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 09:25:21 +1000
    Subject: Re: realist-rationalist quad
    Content-Disposition: inline
    Content-Type: multipart/mixed;  Boundary="0__=D3RqyVzPEjTPpGYspvNaTkgsKOTcdQ4XiXArRIfdV6h5Kmke6wK5LJIG"
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline

    "I don't believe in ism's, I just believe in me." - Ferris Beuller, quoting
    some dead rock star.

    Top left?

    Mark Mills <mmills@htcomp.net> on 14/02/2001 04:51:20 am

    Please respond to memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    cc:
    Subject: realist-rationalist quad

    I've been pondering the idea of a 'realism' - 'rationalism' quad, something
    along the lines of:

    Maybe there needs to be a different explanation of memetics for each
    quadrant.

    anti-realist and anti-rational: anarchist, nihilist (nothing matters,
    nothing makes sense, but don't hold me to that)
    anti-realist and rationalist:: pure rationalist-economists, sociologists,
    artists (culture is too complex to test, but I have an idea)
    realist and anti-rationalist:: pure realist-scientists (ideas come and go,
    but repeatable experiments never change)
    realist and rationalist:: idealist? (an impossible mix?) (drug addicts-I
    know what I need and I know how to get it)
    neutral realist and neutral rationist: engineer? (useful folks, but
    intellectual prostitutes)

    definitions:
    Realist: there is a reality. Our senses give us an incomplete picture.
    Evolution has provided humans with cognitive tools for getting a sense of
    reality, but it just one 'perspective' of many possible.

    Rationalist: We have the mental tools to understand the world. Our
    cognitive powers enable us to rationally discern reality, something our
    senses only confuse.

    Wondered if anyone here was interested in improving my scheme, definitions
    or quadrant labels.

    Mark

    http://www.htcomp.net/markmills

    **********************************************************************
    Important Note
    This email (including any attachments) contains information which is
    confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not
    the intended recipient you must not use, distribute or copy this
    email. If you have received this email in error please notify the
    sender immediately and delete this email. Any views expressed in this
    email are not necessarily the views of AXA. Thank you.
    **********************************************************************

    Content-Type: text/html;  name="att-1.htm"
    Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="att-1.htm"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
    Content-Description: Internet HTML


    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 13 2001 - 22:33:22 GMT