Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id PAA00684 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 9 Feb 2001 15:03:32 GMT Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 20:30:47 +0530 (IST) From: Dr Able Lawrence <able@sgpgi.ac.in> To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10102092021590.6095-100000@sushrut.sgpgi.ac.in> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Generally we take the presence and absence of intention as the
touchstone to distinguish between Lamarckian and Darwinian evolution (I
have intentionally used Lamarckian evolution although we usually use it
only with Darwinian evolution)
Basically we fall upon Darwin to explain how information can be
created and complexity generated by a Darwinian process of evolution
without recourse to the intentional intervention of a conscious being.
This I believe is the political background of the debate.
But once human consciousness has come on the scene we dont need a
superconsciousness but our very own minds to bring in the intention and
direction!
Able
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dr Able Lawrence MD
Senior Resident
Clinical Immunology
SGPGIMS, Lucknow
able@sgpgi.ac.in
Ph +91 98390 70247
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 09 2001 - 15:05:46 GMT