Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA26721 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 8 Feb 2001 19:42:08 GMT Message-ID: <002701c0920c$045954c0$8f09bed4@default> From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be> To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> References: <4A2569EC.001AE5D6.00@c2.nm.com.au> Subject: Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 21:12:25 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
----- Original Message -----
From: <lhousego@axa.com.au>
To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 5:58 AM
Subject: Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution
> But thats a sort of opposable thumbs thing really, isn't it?
> Evolution with the advent of genetic engineering permits choice in gene
> evolution, rather than it just happening.
> Same with memes, it is just that the engineering of them is far more
> instrinsicly "natural".
<< Natural !?
I would like more explanation about that ' instrinsicly natural '...if you
please.
What do you mean....please eloborate....
It is of interest to me....!?
Thanks,
Best regards,
Kenneth
( I am, because we are)
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 08 2001 - 19:44:21 GMT