(no subject)

From: Dr Able Lawrence (able@sgpgi.ac.in)
Date: Thu Feb 08 2001 - 09:26:22 GMT

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: AHRB CENTRE FOR THE EVOLUTIONARY ANALYSIS OF CULTURAL BEHAVIO UR"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id JAA24726 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 8 Feb 2001 09:28:58 GMT
    Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 14:56:22 +0530 (IST)
    From: Dr Able Lawrence <able@sgpgi.ac.in>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10102081441131.18170-100000@sushrut.sgpgi.ac.in>
    Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Shall I ask you a question.

    Can you determine the state of a persons mind without disturbing its
    state?

    Dont the very process of trying to determine the state of mind (making up
    you mind as people say!) actually leads to a state far removed from the
    real state.

    The Heisenbergs uncertainty principle is probably more applicable to mind
    than even subatomic particles. I believe than it is possible for people
    (most people agree) to have two simultaneous but contradictoty thoughts
    although most people would find it uncomfortable with that. Like quantum
    superposition and Schrodinger cat. This I think is the secret of minds
    superiority over digital computers. Just as quantum computers can make
    problems difficult for digital computers appear simple.
        One should make up ones mind only where it is necessary.

    I think I can take the qustion of `Do you believe in God ?` as a test
    case.

    Although many of us would have made up our mind on the matter, the fact
    that there are always two sides on this says this is not all that simple
    for some one seriously asking this question.
    My point is whether it wouldnt be better to let such things hang so that
    we can think both possiblities and get the benefit of wider thinking and
    behave according to what is more appropriate at any given time.

    Those who are concerned about human behaviour and choice making (like
    psephologists for example)must definitely take this seriously.

    I for example talk like a right winger with leftists and a left wingerwith
    rightists depending on our relative position.

    I am a staunch supporter of free market and democracy but has voted left
    in all the elections!

    Yes we all chose the lesser evil. In such situations , wouldnt holding to
    the last help you make a better decision. (I agree not always)

    Any takers on this issue although I agree we are digressing.

                                     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                                     Dr Able Lawrence MD
                                     Senior Resident
                                     Clinical Immunology
                                     SGPGIMS, Lucknow
                                     able@sgpgi.ac.in
                                     Ph +91 98390 70247
                                     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 08 2001 - 09:30:58 GMT