Re: Gemetica and the creation of 'gemes'.

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Tue Feb 06 2001 - 21:23:51 GMT

  • Next message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id VAA18644 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 6 Feb 2001 21:20:25 GMT
    From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 15:23:51 -0600
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: Gemetica and the creation of 'gemes'.
    Message-ID: <3A801707.30776.3FB9248@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <20010206203808.C1517@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    References: <3A7FC41F.2141.2B7AAD7@localhost>; from joedees@bellsouth.net on Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 09:30:07AM -0600
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On 6 Feb 2001, at 20:38, Robin Faichney wrote:

    > On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 09:30:07AM -0600, joedees@bellsouth.net wrote:
    > > On 6 Feb 2001, at 13:44, Robin Faichney wrote: > > > That's one way
    > of looking at it. There are many others. None is > > objectively,
    > inherently superior: meaning is only consistent within a > > language
    > game, and both context and goal are required to determine > > what's
    > right. > > > I do not accept the paradox of absolute relativism, where
    > no answer > is any better or worse than any other.
    >
    > And I don't accept your paradoxical relative absolutism.
    >
    > Answers are nearly always better or worse than each other. All I'm
    > saying is, we need to know the context of the question in order to
    > reliably judge that. We don't even understand the question unless we
    > know its context! Your attempt to transcend context results only in
    > vacuous jargonizing. Context is what keeps us down to earth.
    > Level-headed. You know?
    >
    My context remains experimental verisimilitude; the pragmatic
    'what works is more likely to be true' has been the bedrock of
    scientific inquiry since its inception.
    > --
    > Robin Faichney
    > robin@reborntechnology.co.uk
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 06 2001 - 21:22:34 GMT