Re: Soul and Self

From: Robin Faichney (robin@reborntechnology.co.uk)
Date: Tue Feb 06 2001 - 13:57:41 GMT

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: Gemetica and the creation of 'gemes'."

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id PAA15495 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 6 Feb 2001 15:01:57 GMT
    Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 13:57:41 +0000
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Soul and Self
    Message-ID: <20010206135741.B757@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    References: <3A7F9D39.30053.21FB508@localhost> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10102061834490.20443-100000@sushrut.sgpgi.ac.in>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: inline
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i
    In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10102061834490.20443-100000@sushrut.sgpgi.ac.in>; from able@sgpgi.ac.in on Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 06:37:44PM +0530
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 06:37:44PM +0530, Dr Able Lawrence wrote:
    >
    > Absolutely
    >
    > In complex systems, system behaviour can be treanscendantal and cannot be
    > explained entirely by the properties of its basic constituents as any one
    > from Computer Science would testify.

    Depends what you mean by "entirely explain". Detailed prediction is not
    possible, but modelling of likely scenarios is. (MSc IT, with experience
    of systems dynamics modelling)

    > For example can properties of Silicon explain theaesthetics of a Nivel
    > writtten on a word processor in a computer made of Silicon. Looking for
    > evidence of mind in neurons is like looking for novel in Silicon!!

    True. And looking for top-down mind->body causation is like looking for
    software control over hardware! In practice we do very well by assuming
    it happens, but on analysis the distinction is "all in the mind",
    and it's hardware all the way down/up. Which is not to say the latter
    view is "the correct" one. What is best depends on what one is trying
    to achieve at the time. Of course those who are neurotically driven to
    find ultimate answers to cling to will never accept that. I'm only glad
    we have nobody like that here!

    -- 
    Robin Faichney
    robin@reborntechnology.co.uk
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 06 2001 - 15:04:01 GMT