RE: Evolution of ontogeny

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Tue Feb 06 2001 - 14:13:03 GMT

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id OAA15063 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 6 Feb 2001 14:16:25 GMT
Subject: RE: Evolution of ontogeny
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 09:13:03 -0500
x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu
x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
To: "memetics list" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-ID: <20010206141159.AAA29466@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    On 02/05/01 23:11, joedees@bellsouth.net said this-

    >It's quite possible that the tricks we have memetically picked up
    >and passed on and continue to add to have removed the species
    >selection pressures which previously drove human biological
    >evolution.

    Removed, or buried, or perhaps memetic processes have covered and made
    them available only as interpretations.

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 06 2001 - 14:22:09 GMT