RE: Evolution of ontogeny

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Tue Feb 06 2001 - 11:55:02 GMT

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id LAA13010 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 6 Feb 2001 11:55:56 GMT
    Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745C37@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Evolution of ontogeny
    Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 11:55:02 -0000 
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

            <Yes, 50,000 years may be too little to see biological evolution --
    but we do
    > know that homo sapiens evolved from earlier forms of homo. Are you
    > suggesting that that process has stopped, or simply that the last 50,000
    > years don't reveal biological evolution?
    >
            <I can think of a lot of changes that have happened socially in the
    last
    > 50,000 years that I would call markers of social evolution:
    > sedentarization
    > and farming, empire, distance communication, technological 'symbiosis',
    > etc.
    > I am of course not suggesting that all of these are wholly 'good' -- only
    > that they are of evolutionary consequence, and certainly that they are
    > irreversible.>
    >
            There's also the issue of what changed between homo erectus and
    cro-magnon that led to the cambrian-like cultural explosion? Some argue
    that there must have been some subtle but significant changes in brain
    structure- something unrecoverable archeologically- and that would have been
    a biological change, and thus evolutionary.

            Then of course, you're quite right to point out things like farming,
    extensive niche selection, that has led to distinct population
    characteristics like lactose tolerance in adulthood. Debates do currently
    rage as to whether human biological evolution has effectively stopped or not
    (at least in the developed world) due to low mortality rates etc. I think
    both of these have been mentioned before a couple of weeks ago though, so I
    won't go over old ground.

            Vincent

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 06 2001 - 11:57:55 GMT