RE: Memes and emotions

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Thu Feb 01 2001 - 12:16:27 GMT

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "RE: memetics and ingenuity"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA25150 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:17:29 GMT
    Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745C29@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Memes and emotions
    Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:16:27 -0000 
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    "psychozoans"?

    Sounds like a particularly nasty alien species that captain picard would
    have to very politely, and in his best RADA english, blow out of the sky.

    > ----------
    > From: Scott Chase
    > Reply To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2001 6:00 am
    > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Subject: Re: Memes and emotions
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > >From: Ray Recchia <rrecchia@mail.clarityconnect.com>
    > >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > >To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > >Subject: Re: Memes and emotions
    > >Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 01:43:58 -0500
    > >
    > >When I was a child I was taught that there were 5 taxonomic kingdoms -
    > >bacteria,protozoa,plants,animals and fungi. Later, they decided they
    > >decided certain organisms put in the same category as bacteria were much
    > >different than their relatives, so they added another layer and we ended
    > up
    > >with Domains of Eucarya, Bacteria, and Archaea. With memes, I wonder
    > >whether we can add yet another layer of living organism on top of Domains
    > -
    > >call it the Empires of Memes and Genes.
    > >
    > Yipes. I wouldn't support the idea of "memes" as living organisms and I
    > hardly think they deserve their own taxonomic designation.
    > >
    > >I like to think of humans as genetic organisms in symbiosis with memetic
    > >organisms much like our ancestor protozoans that became the host for
    > >mitochondrial bacteria.
    > >
    > Well, at least mitochondria are tangible.
    >
    > I don't see much of a chasm between humans and other apes (other chimps
    > even- sensu Jared Diamond??). Mayr (in _This is Biology_) contrasts
    > Diamond's "third chimp" view with that of Julian Huxley who erected a
    > separate kingdom for humans called Psychozoa. Maybe you might call your
    > memetic organisms "psychozoans".
    >
    > _________________________________________________________________
    > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 01 2001 - 12:19:45 GMT